3 min read.Updated: 18 Mar 2019, 08:00 AM ISTNeil Borate
While the ‘new age’ ETFs may provide niche exposure to your portfolio, tread carefully as it comes with the challenge of liquidity and rebalancing
Investors should know that liquidity is poor in many ETFs, pushing up the cost of buying and selling
ETFs or Exchange Traded Funds spring from a simple and rather elegant idea. Instead of trying to beat the market, an investor can simply just invest in the market as a whole through an ETF. Being a passive instrument, it typically has lower costs than active funds. This idea first emerged in the US and the ETFs currently are a major force there. However, financial innovators soon added another element to this revolution—they built ETFs around various custom-made indices and branded some of them as ‘smart beta’. Their aim was to give investors some chance at beating the broader market while retaining a low cost and passive structure. The US market now has a host of ETFs tracking sectors, commodities, debt, other countries and even volatility itself (think VIX ETF).
Over the past few years, India has travelled down a similar path. One of its first ETFs, tracking the Nifty 50, was launched on 28 December 2001. This was followed by ETFs tracking the Nifty Junior, gold and the banking sector in the early 2000s. However, the ETF concept has taken off only recently. Over the past few years, many ETFs have been launched. The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), too, has diverted as much as 15% of its incremental inflows into ETFs. The assets under management (AUM) in ETFs has also surged from around ₹14,600 crore in February 2014 to ₹1.18 lakh crore in February 2015—an eightfold growth over the past 4 years (see graph). According to Koel Ghosh, head-business, S&P Dow Jones Indices (S&P DJI) South Asia, “Smart beta indices and ETFs are growing globally and in India. Over the years, the market share has moved from commodity ETFs to equity ETFs."
Nifty Equal Weight Index: This index assigns equal weights to all Nifty stocks rather than weights based on market cap.
Bharat 22 and CPSE Index: These were set up to meet disinvestment targets and are either public sector dominated or have a significant public sector component.
Should you invest?
Experts are divided on whether these ‘new age’ ETFs constitute good investments. Suresh Sadagopan, founder, Ladder7 Financial Advisories, noted the diversification advantage. “The principal indices, Nifty and Sensex, mostly consist of old world companies that do not represent the Indian economy," he said. However, other experts expressed concerns about the complexity and the lack of liquidity. “Although these ETFs can give investors some niche exposure, the vast majority of investors are better served by ETFs tracking the Nifty or Sensex," said Amol Joshi, founder, Plan Rupee Investment Services.
However, investors should note that liquidity is poor in many ETFs, pushing up the cost of buying and selling although this is remedied to some extent by investing in fund-of-funds holding the ETF concerned. Also, a specific ETF theme may look smart today but may not be so in the future. In the absence of a fund manager, there is nobody to move the ETF investors to alternative stocks. The indices tracked by the ETFs in question can also be rejigged by the index provider without any reference to the ETF investors. For example, the CPSE Index has undergone several changes since it was launched in 2014.
So, as an investor, approach such ETFs with caution, given the liquidity and rebalancing challenges. At best, they can be ‘satellites’ to a core portfolio of diversified mutual funds.