CJI Surya Kant on police ‘brutality’ against NEET paper-leak protesters: 'Mere agitation can't justify lathi-charge'

Hearing pleas over the Jantar Mantar NEET protests, CJI Surya Kant observed that merely because there is agitation, it cannot justify police excess.

Written By Akriti Anand
Updated27 Jul 2026, 12:02 PM IST
Add Mint as a preferred source on Google
Video thumbnail
Must Explain: Supreme Court's Big Remark While Hearing Plea On Police Action Against NEET Protesters

The Supreme Court observed on Monday (July 27) that the right to peaceful protest is a constitutional guarantee, and that the mere existence of an agitation cannot justify alleged police excesses against protesters. The court also called for a uniform national protocol on handling demonstrations.

The Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant made the remarks while hearing the petition seeking action against police excess during the Jantar Mantar NEET protests.

Also Read | CJP to unveil next strategy after Pradhan's resignation, says Abhijeet Dipke

The ‘Sansad Chalo’ protest march, led by the Cockroach Janta Party on July 20 in Delhi, witnessed clashes between protesters and security personnel. Video and photos on social media showed police using lathis and tear gas shells to disperse crowds attempting to move towards Parliament.

Quick answers to key questions

5 QUESTIONS
1
What did Chief Justice Surya Kant say about police brutality during the NEET protests?

CJI Surya Kant stated that the right to peaceful protest is constitutionally guaranteed and that mere agitation does not justify police excesses. He emphasized that claims of police brutality should be independently examined.

2
Why is a uniform national protocol for handling demonstrations necessary, according to the Supreme Court?

The Supreme Court highlighted the importance of a uniform national protocol to ensure consistent and disciplined handling of protests, which is essential for maintaining order and respecting the democratic process.

3
How did the protests against the NEET paper leak lead to the resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan?

The protests, led by the Cockroach Janta Party, demanded accountability for the NEET paper leaks, which culminated in significant public pressure, ultimately prompting the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

4
What injuries were reported during the July 20 protests in Delhi?

Protesters reported suffering pellet-like injuries during the clashes, with individuals describing severe wounds similar to those caused by pellet guns, although Delhi Police denied the use of such weapons.

5
Should information about protests be verified before sharing, based on police advisories?

Yes, the police urged the public to refrain from sharing unverified information related to the protests, warning that misinformation could exacerbate tensions and distort the realities of the situation.

The protesters were demanding the resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan as the Union Education Minister over the NEET paper leak issue.

What did CJI said on police ‘brutality’

"Right to peaceful, lawful protest absolutely guaranteed under the Constitution. So long as it is peaceful agitation, merely because there is agitation, there can't be...If there is excess committed, it should be independently examined," CJI Surya Kant was quoted by Live Law as saying on pleas alleging police brutality against student protestors.

The court observed that allegations of police excess should be independently examined and stressed the need for uniform police protocols for handling demonstrations nationwide.

Also Read | How Lathicharge Backfired & Made CJP Protests Even More Powerful |

"It's not only a case of Delhi. Uniformity in protocol is required. Merely because agitation is there, it doesn't mean lathi-charge. Discipline is integral to the democratic process," the CJI said on Monday.

“There should be a protocol when someone wants to agitate peacefully. Proper space for that. There is no impediment in that regard. But if there is any anti-social element that can be dealt with,” the CJI was quoted by ANI as saying.

"Self-evolved discipline is needed which is essential to democratic process," the CJI said and urged parties to assist the bench in an inadversarial manner.

The court directed that all connected petitions be listed together on Tuesday, July 28.

Plea by family of policemen

The bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana also agreed to take up a separate plea, filed by a few family members of those police personnel who were attacked during the protest, along with other listed petitions.

The CJI stressed that the life of every individual, including police personnel, is equally important.

Also Read | CJP Protest: Another protester claims ‘pellet’ injuries — ‘I could not feel…’

According to Live Law, the court allowed the request of a counsel, appearing for the families of policemen injured during the incident, to participate in the proceedings.

Justice Bagchi orally observed, “Injury to an individual, be it to policemen or [students], is of equal concern. We may call upon the state to explain why adequate equipment was not given to police to handle such...they should have helmets.”

Stay updated with the latest Trending, India, World and US news.

HomeNewsIndiaCJI Surya Kant on police ‘brutality’ against NEET paper-leak protesters: 'Mere agitation can't justify lathi-charge'
More