comScore
Active Stocks
Fri Dec 01 2023 15:59:55
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 129.95 1.56%
  1. Reliance Industries share price
  2. 2,393.45 0.72%
  1. NTPC share price
  2. 269.05 2.97%
  1. ICICI Bank share price
  2. 946.35 1.19%
  1. HDFC Bank share price
  2. 1,555.5 -0.22%
Business News/ News / India/  Insulting woman, not behaving in chivalrous manner wouldn’t amount to outraging modesty: Delhi HC
Back Back

Insulting woman, not behaving in chivalrous manner wouldn’t amount to outraging modesty: Delhi HC

The high court sets aside a trial court order framing a charge under section 509 of IPC against a man for calling a woman ‘gandi aurat’

Gender-specific laws are not meant to be ‘anti-opposite gender’ but to serve the purpose of addressing unique issues faced by a particular gender, the high court said. HTPremium
Gender-specific laws are not meant to be ‘anti-opposite gender’ but to serve the purpose of addressing unique issues faced by a particular gender, the high court said. HT

While setting aside a trial court order, the Delhi high court has said that insulting a woman or being rude to her and not behaving in a chivalrous manner will not amount to outraging the modesty of a woman.

The high court set aside a trial court order framing a charge under section 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman) of the IPC, saying a prima facie case was made out against the man.

In the case, it was alleged that the man used foul language against the woman when she refused to give him 1,000 and called her ‘gandi aurat’ (dirty woman). Both, the complainant woman and the man were working in the same organisation and the man was her senior.

In its order, the high court said the word ‘gandi aurat’, if read in isolation, without context, without any preceding or succeeding words indicating intent to outrage the modesty of a woman, will not bring these words within the ambit of section 509 of IPC.

“Had there been any mention of any other words used, context given or any other gesture etc. made accompanying, succeeding or preceding these words, reflecting criminal intent to outrage the modesty of a woman, the outcome of the case would have been different," it said. Gender-specific laws are not meant to be “anti-opposite gender" but to serve the purpose of addressing unique issues faced by a particular gender, the high court said.

“Gender-specific legislation exists to address the unique concerns and challenges faced by particular genders within society. However, this does not imply that the judge is to be influenced or swayed by gender-related factors when administering justice unless specific presumptions are legislated in favour of a particular gender in law," Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said.

“In essence, judicial neutrality is an indispensable cornerstone of the legal system, ensuring that all parties, regardless of gender, are treated fairly and equitably," Justice Sharma also said.

(With inputs from PTI)

Milestone Alert!
Livemint tops charts as the fastest growing news website in the world 🌏 Click here to know more.

Catch all the Elections News, Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
More Less
Updated: 29 Aug 2023, 11:29 PM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App