Kunal Kamra tweets: SC to decide on Friday whether to initiate contempt proceedings against comedian3 min read . Updated: 17 Dec 2020, 01:04 PM IST
- A bench of justices Ashok Bhushan, RS Reddy and MR Shah will pronounce the orders tomorrow
The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its order on criminal contempt proceedings filed against stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra for his alleged scandalous tweets against the top court.
A bench of justices Ashok Bhushan, RS Reddy and MR Shah will pronounce the orders tomorrow.
The pleas came up for hearing today before an SC bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan, which heard the submissions of advocate Nishant R Katneshwarkar, who appeared for one of the petitioners, and claimed that Kamra had posted several tweets scandalous to the judiciary.
"All these tweets are scandalous and we had sought consent from the attorney general," Katneshwarkar told the bench, which also comprised justices R S Reddy and M R Shah.
He read out the letter of Attorney General K K Venugopal, who had granted consent for initiation of criminal contempt proceedings against Kamra.
The bench asked the lawyer not to read the alleged contemptuous tweets of the comic artist in the court, saying they have already gone through Venugopal's letter on the issue.
The consent of either the attorney general or the solicitor general is necessary under section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for initiating contempt proceedings against a person.
The attorney general had granted consent for initiation of criminal contempt proceedings against Kamra, saying the tweets are in “bad taste" and it is time that people understand that attacking the apex court brazenly will attract punishment under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1972.
One of the petitions has been filed by law student Shrirang Katneshwarkar and others, who have claimed that Kamra had started publishing tweets on November 11, when the top court was hearing the appeal of journalist Arnab Goswami against the Bombay High Court's order rejecting his plea seeking interim bail in a 2018 abetment to suicide case.
The plea has alleged that after the top court granted interim bail to Goswami on November 11, Kamra “again published various tweets and thereby scandalized" the apex court and “further lowered" its authority.
“The alleged contemnor (Kamra) has the following of 1.7 million people. The scandalous tweets of the alleged contemnor were seen by his followers and many of them retweeted the same," the plea has claimed.
It has alleged that when some persons tried to make Kamra aware of the contempt of court, he was “rude, arrogant and unapologetic" and his conduct shows that he has “no regard" for the top court.
The plea has alleged that his tweets are in “such bad taste" that an ordinarily prudent man can gather that he has scandalised the apex court.
“The citizens of India have highest regard to the courts of law. No law-abiding citizen of this country would tolerate such act of publication of tweets by the alleged contemnor (Kamra)," it said.
“This court, by showing magnanimity and grace had let off the contemnors in the past upon tendering apology. But the conduct of the alleged contemnor is so harsh that the alleged contemnor does not deserve any sympathy at the hands of this court even in case of tendering apology. Citizens of this country strongly believe that the people like the alleged contemnor should not be spared at any cost," it said.
Venugopal had granted consent for initiation of criminal contempt proceedings against Kamra for his tweets and said that today people believe that they can “boldly and brazenly condemn" the Supreme Court of India and its judges by exercising their freedom of speech, but under the Constitution, the freedom of speech is subject to the law of contempt.
“I have gone through each one of the tweets which you have annexed for consent to proceed by way of criminal contempt against Kunal Kamra. The tweets which I am extracting below are not only in bad taste but clearly cross the line between humour and contempt of the court," the attorney general had said in his letter to one of the applicants who had sought his consent for initiation of contempt proceedings against Kamra.
The case against Kamra relates to a series of tweets he put out criticising the top court for the manner in which it had fast-tracked Republic TV owner Arnab Goswami’s bail plea, even as thousands of undertrials languishing in jails across the court find it difficult to get a hearing.
With agency inputs