Man cannot ‘wriggle out’ of maintenance duty by citing personal loans, rules Delhi High Court

In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court determined that a man cannot avoid maintenance payments to his wife and child by citing personal loans or EMIs, reaffirming the obligation to support dependents takes precedence over voluntary debts.

Livemint
Updated4 Jun 2025, 07:59 AM IST
The Delhi High Court ruled that personal loans and EMIs cannot excuse a man from paying maintenance to his wife and child. Photo-ARVIND YADAV. (Representative Image)
The Delhi High Court ruled that personal loans and EMIs cannot excuse a man from paying maintenance to his wife and child. Photo-ARVIND YADAV. (Representative Image)

Voluntary financial obligations like personal loans or EMIs cannot be used by a man as an excuse to evade maintenance payments to his wife and child, the Delhi High Court has ruled, as reported by The Hindustan Times.

The observation was made on May 26 while hearing a petition from a man challenging a city court’s April 19, 2025 order, which directed him to pay interim maintenance of 15,000 — 8,000 to his estranged wife and 7,000 to their minor son, according to the report by HT.

Also Read: Achraf Hakimi divorce: Can husband escape maintenance to wife in India? What does the law say

“A person cannot wriggle out of his/her statutory liability to maintain his/her spouse and dependents by artificially reducing his/her disposable income through personal borrowings or long-term financial commitments undertaken unilaterally,” the bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Renu Bhatnagar observed in its verdict released on Saturday.

Also Read: Viral video: Man turns up in court with 80,000 alimony money in 1 and 2 coins - Find out what happens next

The order further stated, “Deductions such as house rent, electricity charges, repayment of personal loans, premiums for life insurance, or EMIs for voluntary borrowings do not qualify as legitimate deductions in this context. These are deemed voluntary financial obligations assumed by the earning spouse and cannot take precedence over the fundamental duty to support a dependent spouse or child.”

A person cannot wriggle out of his/her statutory liability to maintain his/her spouse and dependents by artificially reducing his/her disposable income through personal borrowings.
Deductions such as house rent or EMIs for voluntary borrowings do not qualify as legitimate deductions in this context.

Also Read: The split-up: How to protect your assets before and after marriage

The couple married in February 2009 and had a child, but began living separately in March 2020. Following the separation, the wife approached the court seeking 30,000 per month as interim maintenance.

Key Takeaways
  • Personal financial obligations cannot be used as justification for avoiding maintenance payments.
  • The court prioritizes the duty to support dependents over voluntary financial commitments.
  • Legal obligations regarding maintenance can have significant implications for personal financial management.

Stay updated with the latest Trending, India , World and United States news. Follow all the latest updates on Israel Iran Conflict here on Livemint.

Business NewsNewsIndiaMan cannot ‘wriggle out’ of maintenance duty by citing personal loans, rules Delhi High Court
MoreLess