Supreme Court finds Bihar's SIR ‘actually inclusive’ and ‘voter friendly’ despite exclusion of Aadhaar — Here's why

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of pleas challenging the June 24 decision of Election Commission to conduct SIR in poll bound Bihar

Livemint
Updated13 Aug 2025, 03:06 PM IST
Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi, TMC MP Derek O'Brien, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut, Samajwadi Party chief and MP Akhilesh Yadav and other INDIA bloc leaders march from Parliament’s Makar Dwar to the Election Commission, protesting the Special Intensive Revision of Bihar’s electoral rolls and alleging voter fraud in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.
Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi, TMC MP Derek O'Brien, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut, Samajwadi Party chief and MP Akhilesh Yadav and other INDIA bloc leaders march from Parliament’s Makar Dwar to the Election Commission, protesting the Special Intensive Revision of Bihar’s electoral rolls and alleging voter fraud in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.(ANI)

The Supreme Court said on Wednesday that Bihar's special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral roll was “voter friendly” given that the 11 documents required to be submitted by an elector as opposed to only seven documents in summary revision conducted previously.

The remarks were made by a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi as they resumed the hearing on a batch of pleas challenging the Election Commission's June 24 decision to conduct the SIR exercise in poll-bound Bihar.

Hearing the petitions, the bench observed that contrary to the petitioners' arguments that non-acceptance of Aadhaar was exclusionary, the large number of acceptable documents show that the SIR was “actually inclusionary”.

Also Read | In pics: Opposition sports ‘Minta Devi’ T-shirts during protest against SIR

“The number of documents in summary revision conducted earlier in the state was seven and in SIR it is 11, which shows it is voter friendly. We understand your arguments that non-acceptance of Aadhaar is exclusionary but a high number of documents is actually inclusionary,” the bench said.

The SC noted that electors are required to submit any one of the 11 documents mentioned by the EC to prove citizenship.

Petitioners argue over SIR

Appearing for the petitioners, senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi disagreed with the Supreme Court's observation and said that the number of required documents may be high but had the least coverage.

The advocate cited an example of passport availability with the electors and said that only one or two per cent of citizens in Bihar held the documents and they have no provision for permanent resident certificates given in the state.

“If we see the availability of documents with the population in Bihar it can be seen the coverage is very low,” Singhvi said.

However, the bench argued that Bihar has a coverage of 36 lakh passport holders, which seems to be good.

“The list of documents is prepared normally after taking feedback from various government departments to ensure maximum coverage,” Justice Bagchi noted.

Also Read | INDIA bloc MPs wear ‘124-yr-old’ Minta Devi tees in ‘vote chori’, SIR protest
Also Read | High drama on streets of Delhi as opposition protests over ‘vote chori’, SIR

On August 12, the top court said inclusion and exclusion of citizens or non-citizens from the electoral rolls was within the remit of the Election Commission and backed its stand to not accept Aadhaar and voter cards as conclusive proof of citizenship in the SIR of voters' list in Bihar.

Stay updated with the latest Trending, India , World and US news. Read the latest updates on the Supreme Court verdict regarding Delhi-NCR stray dog relocation and ongoing protests now on Livemint.

Business NewsNewsIndiaSupreme Court finds Bihar's SIR ‘actually inclusive’ and ‘voter friendly’ despite exclusion of Aadhaar — Here's why
More