Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg responded defiantly to criticism of his company’s recent decision to eliminate third-party fact-checking and relax content moderation rules across Facebook, Instagram, and Threads. Many users have expressed concerns that these changes could lead to increased misinformation and an exodus of users, with some accusing Zuckerberg of pandering to political figures like President-elect Donald Trump.
In a reply on Threads, Zuckerberg shrugged off the criticisms, suggesting that those who choose to leave the platforms are merely “virtue signaling.”
He emphasized that the changes were intended to improve the user experience, particularly with the introduction of the Community Notes feature. “I’m counting on these changes actually making our platforms better,” Zuckerberg wrote. “I think Community Notes will be more effective than fact-checkers, reducing the number of people whose accounts get mistakenly banned is good, people want to be able to discuss civic topics and make arguments that are in the mainstream of political discourse.”
The controversy stems from Meta’s shift away from third-party fact-checking, a measure designed to curb the spread of misinformation, and the decision to remove certain restrictions on topics like immigration and gender. Zuckerberg argued that these policies had become outdated and out of touch with mainstream discourse.
In post on Threads, one user had accused Meta of creating a "chokehold" by making it difficult for people to leave, while profiting from their continued presence. The user argued that Meta was trapping users in a cycle that reinforced the company’s business model. "Meta has us in a chokehold. They make money off our presence in order to continue to be in business and yet it’s too difficult for people to leave,” the user wrote.
Zuckerberg rejected the notion of a mass user exodus. “Some people may leave our platforms for virtue signaling, but I think the vast majority and many new users will find that these changes make the products better,” he responded.
In his Tuesday (January 7) announcement, Zuckerberg defended Meta's decision to scale back third-party fact-checking and relax certain content restrictions across its platforms, including Facebook and Instagram.
Zuckerberg criticized the mainstream media for its persistent emphasis on misinformation, which he believes undermines public trust. "We tried in good faith to address those concerns without becoming the arbiters of truth," Zuckerberg said.
Acknowledging the challenges of moderating content, Zuckerberg admitted that the third-party fact-checkers previously relied upon by Facebook had been "too politically biased" and "have destroyed more trust than they created." This admission underpins Meta’s decision to replace fact-checking with Community Notes, a new initiative that Zuckerberg believes will be more effective in managing misinformation.
In his announcement, Zuckerberg also revealed that Meta would be removing “restrictions on topics like immigration and gender,” calling them “out of touch with mainstream discourse.” He framed these changes as a step toward making the platforms more in tune with current societal debates.
In another major change, Zuckerberg revealed that Meta would be relocating its content moderation teams out of California and moving them to Texas. This shift is part of the company’s effort to streamline its operations and address concerns over the political biases of its content moderation policies.
These announcements are part of Meta’s broader efforts to reshape its content policies amid increasing pressure from both users and regulators.
While Zuckerberg maintains that the changes will improve the user experience and foster more open dialogue, the decision to loosen content controls has already sparked a debate over the balance between free speech and the responsibility to combat misinformation.
Catch all the Business News , Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.