Trump election order requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration blocked by judge

In her ruling, judge said the Constitution does not grant the president specific powers to regulate elections, emphasizing that such authority rests with states and Congress.

Written By Ravi Hari
Published24 Jun 2026, 11:14 PM IST
A sign hangs at a voting center during Utah's primary election on Tuesday, June 23, 2026, in Salt Lake City. (AP Photo/Alex Goodlett)
A sign hangs at a voting center during Utah's primary election on Tuesday, June 23, 2026, in Salt Lake City. (AP Photo/Alex Goodlett)(AP Photo/Alex Goodlett)

A US federal judge on Wednesday (June 24) permanently blocked most provisions of President Donald Trump’s executive order on elections, including a controversial requirement that voters provide documentary proof of US citizenship when registering.

US District Judge Denise Casper in Boston converted a prior preliminary injunction into a permanent ruling, finding that the order overstepped presidential authority and violated constitutional limits on executive power over elections.

Court rejects presidential authority over election rules

In her ruling, Judge Casper said the Constitution does not grant the President specific powers to regulate elections, emphasizing that such authority rests with states and Congress.

Quick answers to key questions

5 QUESTIONS
1
Why did a judge block Trump's executive order requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration?

A federal judge ruled that the order overstepped presidential authority and violated constitutional limits on executive power over elections, stating such authority resides with states and Congress.

2
What provisions of Trump's election order were blocked by the judge?

The judge blocked several provisions, including the requirement for mandatory documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration and restrictions on counting mail ballots received after Election Day.

3
How does the ruling against Trump's executive order impact federal election procedures?

The ruling prevents the implementation of measures that could have significantly altered federal election procedures, maintaining existing regulations on voter registration and ballot counting.

4
What was the political reaction to the judge's ruling on the voter registration order?

New York Attorney General Letitia James welcomed the decision, calling it a rejection of an unconstitutional attempt to control elections and reaffirming the importance of protecting voting rights.

5
Should voters be concerned about the implications of Trump's executive order on future elections?

Yes, because if implemented, Trump's order could have introduced stricter voting regulations, potentially impacting access to registration and ballot casting for many voters.

“The Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections,” she wrote, rejecting the administration’s argument that the legal challenge was premature.

The lawsuit had been filed by Democratic state attorneys general, who argued the order unlawfully attempted to reshape federal election rules.

What Trump’s order aimed to change

The blocked executive order included several major proposals that would have significantly altered US election procedures:

-Mandatory documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration

-Restrictions on counting mail ballots received after Election Day, even if postmarked on time

-Potential withholding of federal funding from states that did not comply

The court ruling effectively prevents implementation of most of these measures.

Political and legal fallout

New York Attorney General Letitia James welcomed the decision, calling it a rejection of what she described as an “unconstitutional attempt to seize control of our elections.” She said her office would continue defending voting rights ahead of the upcoming midterm elections.

“Generations of Americans fought tirelessly for the right to vote, and we honor their legacy by protecting that right against anyone who tries to undermine it," she said.

The ruling marks the latest setback for Trump’s election-related executive actions, many of which have faced ongoing legal challenges across multiple courts.

Broader legal battles continue

Another federal court in Washington, D.C., has already blocked parts of the same executive order, including efforts to add citizenship verification to federal voter registration forms and impose restrictions on military voting access.

Meanwhile, Trump has continued to push for legislative alternatives through Congress, backing the SAVE America Act, which would introduce proof-of-citizenship requirements nationwide. The bill has passed the House but remains stalled in the Senate amid opposition and procedural hurdles.

Link to broader political strategy

The legal ruling comes as Trump intensifies pressure on congressional Republicans to advance his election-security agenda. On the same day, he canceled a planned signing ceremony for a bipartisan housing bill, saying he would not approve unrelated legislation until Congress passes voter citizenship requirements.

The issue of mail ballot deadlines may also be affected by an upcoming US Supreme Court ruling that could determine whether ballots must arrive by Election Day, a decision that could reshape voting rules in multiple states.


(With AP inputs)

Also Read | Why did Trump abruptly cancel the signing of the bipartisan housing bill?

Stay updated with the latest Trending, India, World and US news.

HomeNewsUs NewsTrump election order requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration blocked by judge
More