
US President Donald Trump on Sunday (local time) announced that he had decided to call off ordering American forces to carry out new strikes against Iran following requests from Gulf allies Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Trump made these remarks while addressing reporters on Air Force One as he flew back to the capital after spending the weekend at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey. The US President said, “I'm not looking to kill people because people die... we don't want that... I asked Saudi Arabia's king and crown prince. I said, would you rather have us do this or not? They said, we would much prefer a deal... Because you don't know where these attacks lead. I mean, they will be flooded with people pouring into their country, and it will be a disaster. A lot of bad things can happen.”
Quick answers to key questions
Trump decided to halt strikes on Iran following requests from Gulf allies, including Saudi Arabia, who emphasized the importance of diplomacy to prevent regional conflict.
The Crown Prince warned that any military escalation could widen the conflict, endangering regional and global security, and advocated for a negotiated settlement instead.
Iran denied Trump's assertion, calling it a 'new lie,' and stated that their armed forces were prepared for any potential U.S. military action.
The negotiations will focus on reopening the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping lane, and addressing Iran's nuclear program.
Concerns over escalating violence, the depletion of U.S. military resources, and pressure from regional allies influenced the decision to pursue diplomatic solutions.
His remarks marked a sharp turnaround from a day earlier, when he said he was “losing faith” in negotiations with Iran and warned that the US military "will be hitting them very hard." The comments came after he spoke with the Saudi crown prince on 1 August, before announcing that Middle East allies had reached the "perimeters" of a deal to end the five-month-old war.
He further said, “Now what we're doing is we're talking to them in the form of a negotiation. It begins tomorrow afternoon,” and went on to say that he had been asked by the Islamic Republic as well as Washington's allies in the region to hold off on the strikes, which he claimed would have been the largest since World War II.
However, Tehran denied that it asked Trump not to strike.
The developments come at a time amid growing concerns over Washington's depleting stockpile of munitions, including its Patriot missile interceptor systems.
Trump also noted that new negotiations with Tehran will commence on Monday (local time) after he decided to call off strikes on the Islamic Republic to pursue a deal to end the war, which is entering its sixth month, AFP reported.
On 2 August, he told reporters that the talks would focus on the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway that has been the sticking point in negotiations between the two sides and has remained largely shut since the conflict began, as well as the eventual denuclearization of Iran.
Iran has been at war with the US since it launched a surprise attack with Israel in late February, though months of on-and-off diplomacy led to periods of relative calm. However, the two sides resumed tit-for-tat strikes last month, weeks after an interim deal was signed to pave the way for future negotiations to end the conflict permanently.
After the two sides resumed hostilities, fears mounted that the tit-for-tat strikes could escalate once again and turn into a full-blown war. Trump had warned that the US could strike Iran "very hard" and was reportedly weighing fresh military action, including potential attacks on the country's energy infrastructure, while US embassies across the region remained on high alert.
The focus would now be on negotiations and whether the two sides would once again agree to halt strikes and resume talks for a lasting peace deal.
(with agency inputs)
Swati Gandhi is a digital journalist with over four years of experience, specialising in international and geopolitical issues. Her work focuses on foreign policy, global power shifts, and the political and economic forces shaping international relations, with a particular emphasis on how global developments affect India. She approaches journalism with a strong belief in context-driven reporting, aiming to break down complex global events into clear, accessible narratives for a wide readership.<br><br> Previously, Swati has worked at Business Standard, where she covered a range of beats including national affairs, politics, and business. This diverse newsroom experience helped her build a strong grounding in reporting, while also strengthening her ability to work across both breaking news and in-depth explanatory stories. Covering multiple beats early in her career has helped her be informed about her current work, allowing her to connect domestic developments with wider international trends.<br><br> At Live Mint, she focuses on international and geopolitical issues through a business and economic lens, examining how global political developments, foreign policy decisions, and power shifts impact markets, industries, and India’s strategic and economic interests.<br><br> She holds a Bachelor’s degree in English (Honours) from the University of Delhi and a Master’s degree in Journalism and Mass Communication from Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University. Her academic training has shaped her emphasis on precision, analytical rigour, and clarity in writing. Her interests include global political economy and the intersection of geopolitics with business.<br><br> Outside work, Swati focuses on exploring her passion and love for food. From fancy cafes to street spots, Swati explores food like a true foodie.
Oops! Looks like you have exceeded the limit to bookmark the image. Remove some to bookmark this image.