
United States Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday dismissed suggestions that Iran could deploy mine-carrying dolphins against American warships in the Strait of Hormuz, while conspicuously stopping short of denying that the US Navy operates its own marine mammal programme.
Hegseth's remarks, made during a Pentagon briefing, have drawn renewed attention to a reportedly classified-adjacent world of military dolphin training that US experts say is far more sophisticated and ethically considered than its Hollywood reputation suggests.
Hegseth was responding to reports, including one published by The Wall Street Journal on 30 April, that Iranian officials had floated the idea of using "mine-carrying dolphins" to strike US warships navigating the contested strait. His answer was carefully worded.
"I cannot confirm or deny whether we have Kamikaze dolphins, but I can confirm they don't," Hegseth told reporters, invoking the term for Japanese pilots who deliberately flew their planes into their targets during the Second World War.
The US Navy Office of Information declined to comment beyond Hegseth's briefing. Whether Iran possesses any such capability remains unclear. One source familiar with US operations in the Strait told CNN the military is not currently deploying dolphins there.
The existence of a US military dolphin programme is not in dispute. Since 1959, the Navy's Marine Mammal Program (NMMP), administered by the Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific, has trained bottlenose dolphins and California sea lions to locate underwater mines, detect unauthorised divers and recover submerged objects.
According to the programme's own documentation, dolphins "possess the most sophisticated sonar known to science," and underwater drones remain "no match for the animals." Both species, the US Navy says, have “excellent low light vision and underwater directional hearing that allow them to detect and track undersea targets, even in dark or murky waters.”
These are not, however, weapons in any conventional sense. When a dolphin identifies a mine during an operation, it taps a paddle at the front of its handler's boat to signal a find, then drops a marker buoy near the location so human divers can disable it.
"We use marine mammals to help detect objects under water and to protect ports by detecting intruders," said Scott Savitz, a senior engineer at the RAND Corporation who previously worked with the now-decommissioned US Navy mine warfare command. "So it's not 'The Day of the Dolphin.'"
The biological capabilities that make dolphins valuable to naval operations are well documented. Their biosonar, or echolocation, allows them to distinguish between objects with a precision that electronic sonar cannot replicate.
"They can not only locate objects, but differentiate them with a greater degree of facility than the machines that we've been able to develop for this purpose," Savitz said.
Sea lions complement dolphins in cluttered or low-visibility environments, owing to their exceptional underwater eyesight. During the Iraq War in 2003, the mammals played what Savitz described as a "key role" in detecting and clearing naval mines from the port of Umm Qasr -- though he was careful to note the conditions under which they were deployed.
"Hostilities had basically ceased," he said. "You're not trying to fight your way in with dolphins."
During the Vietnam War, the Navy also trained dolphins to detect swimmers and divers attempting to breach military facilities, an operational use that has since been documented in declassified material.
The United States is not alone in having explored the military utility of marine mammals. During the Cold War, the Soviet Navy maintained its own dolphin programme. Following the Soviet collapse, that capability passed to Ukraine. Russia reportedly revived its dolphin programme after seizing Ukrainian defence dolphins during the annexation of Crimea in 2014. In 2022, satellite imagery identified two dolphin enclosures within Sevastopol harbour.
Iran purchased dolphins in 2000, according to BBC reporting, though those animals would today be well beyond operational age. There is no verified evidence that Tehran maintains an active programme. The Wall Street Journal's April report that Iran was considering mine-carrying dolphins was based on statements from Iranian officials, and the feasibility of such a deployment remains unconfirmed.
The use of animals in armed conflict occupies an uncertain legal space. According to CNN, Chris Jenks, a research professor of law at Southern Methodist University, said few formal protections exist for animals in warfare, though some strategies rooted in international humanitarian law could theoretically be applied.
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals has stated it "recognises the value" of animals in military roles, but maintains that "animals should not be unnecessarily put at risk or sacrificed in the service of our country." The organisation's position holds that military animals “should be humanely trained and responsibly maintained, and commitment to the animals' well-being must extend beyond the period of military service.”
Sayantani Biswas is an assistant editor at Livemint with seven years of experience covering geopolitics, foreign policy, international relations and global power dynamics. She reports on Indian and international politics, including elections worldwide, and specialises in historically grounded analysis of contemporary conflicts and state decisions. She joined Mint in 2021, after covering politics at publications including The Telegraph. <br> She holds an MPhil in Comparative Literature from Jadavpur University (2019), with a specialisation in postcolonial Latin American literature. Her research examined economic nationalism through Eduardo Galeano’s Open Veins of Latin America. She also writes on political language, cultural memory and the long shadows of conflict. <br> Biswas grew up in Durgapur, an industrial town in West Bengal shaped by migration, which drew families from across India to the Durgapur Steel Plant. As the only child in a joint family, she spent years listening—almost obsessively—to her grandparents’ testimonies of struggle, fear and loss as they fled Bangladesh during the Partition of 1947. This formative exposure to lived historical memory later converged with her training in Comparative Literature, equipping her to analyse socio-economic structures and their reverberations. <br> Outside the newsroom, she gravitates towards cultural history and critical theory, returning often to texts such as Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. As a journalist, she is committed to accuracy, intellectual rigour and fairness, and believes political reporting demands not only clarity and speed, but historical depth, contextual precision, and a disciplined resistance to spectacle.
Oops! Looks like you have exceeded the limit to bookmark the image. Remove some to bookmark this image.