India rejects Hague court's ‘illegal’ ruling on J&K hydroelectric projects: 'Charade at Pakistan's behest'

India rejected the Permanent Court of Arbitration's ruling on two hydroelectric projects in Jammu and Kashmir, asserting it never recognized the dispute resolution framework with Pakistan. 

Livemint
Updated28 Jun 2025, 08:44 AM IST
The office of Lino at the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which is adjudicating disputes raised by Pakistan regarding the Kishenganga and Ratle dams. (PTI)
The office of Lino at the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which is adjudicating disputes raised by Pakistan regarding the Kishenganga and Ratle dams. (PTI)(HT_PRINT)

India on Friday firmly rejected a ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague concerning two hydroelectric projects – Kishenganga and Ratle – located in Jammu and Kashmir.

In a statement, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) dismissed the decision as a “so-called supplemental award,” stating that India has never accepted the framework under which this arbitration was conducted.

The MEA noted that India does not recognise the jurisdiction of the court in this matter, especially regarding dispute resolution mechanisms involving Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty.

In its ruling, the Court of Arbitration said India's decision in April to keep the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance “does not limit” its competence over the dispute and that its ruling is binding on the parties.

“This latest charade at Pakistan's behest is yet another desperate attempt by it to escape accountability for its role as the global epicenter of terrorism,” the MEA said.

Also Read: BIG arrest: 2 arrested for harbouring Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists responsible for Pahalgam terror attack, says NIA

“Pakistan's resort to this fabricated arbitration mechanism is consistent with its decades-long pattern of deception and manipulation of international forums,” it said in a statement.

India has never recognised the proceedings at the Permanent Court of Arbitration after Pakistan raised objections to certain design elements of the two projects under the provisions of the Indus Waters Treaty.

Also Read: How India and Pakistan compare in military powers, strength and defence budget

“Today, the illegal Court of Arbitration, purportedly constituted under the Indus Waters Treaty 1960, albeit in brazen violation of it, has issued what it characterizes as a 'supplemental award' on its competence concerning the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects in the Indian Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir,” the MEA said.

“India has never recognised the existence in law of this so-called Court of Arbitration,” it said.

The MEA said India's position has all along been that the constitution of this so-called arbitral body is in itself a serious breach of the Indus Waters Treaty and consequently any proceedings before this forum and any award or decision taken by it are also illegal for that reason.

A day after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, India took a series of punitive measures against Pakistan that included putting the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 in “abeyance”.

“Following the Pahalgam terrorist attack, India has in exercise of its rights as a sovereign nation under international law, placed the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance, until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism,” the MEA said.

Also Read: Operation Sindoor: How India carried out its ‘most significant' military action inside Pakistan in 5 decades

“Until such time that the treaty is in abeyance, India is no longer bound to perform any of its obligations under the treaty,” it said.

“No court of arbitration, much less this illegally constituted arbitral body which has no existence in the eye of law, has the jurisdiction to examine the legality of India's actions in exercise of its rights as a sovereign,” it added.

This latest charade at Pakistan's behest is yet another desperate attempt by it to escape accountability for its role as the global epicenter of terrorism.
India has never recognized the existence in law of this so-called Court of Arbitration.

India, therefore, categorically rejects this so-called supplemental award as it has rejected all prior pronouncements of this body, it said.

(With inputs from PTI)

Key Takeaways
  • India maintains a strong stance against the jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of Arbitration regarding disputes with Pakistan.
  • The ruling reinforces India's position of placing the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance due to cross-border terrorism concerns.
  • India's rejection highlights ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan over water-sharing agreements and terrorism.

Stay updated with the latest Trending, India , World and United States news.

Business NewsNewsWorldIndia rejects Hague court's ‘illegal’ ruling on J&K hydroelectric projects: 'Charade at Pakistan's behest'
MoreLess