
Shanghai Jiaotong University is investigating a girl's death during a trial. The incident occurred during an experimental gene-editing procedure in 2025. This has raised serious ethical concerns across China's biomedical sector, according to CNN.
The university has established a working group for investigation purposes. It will examine both the clinical trial and the related paper.
The announcement followed a joint report from Science and Retraction Watch. These publications detailed the botched trial in significant depth.
The girl was diagnosed with Snijders Blok-Campeau syndrome, a rare condition. Her parents pursued specialised gene therapy despite milder symptoms initially.
They connected with neuroscientist Qiu Zilong at Shanghai Jiaotong University. He specialised in base editing techniques for rare paediatric diseases.
Under his treatment plan, she'd receive groundbreaking brain-directed gene therapy. Qiu reportedly assured the family there'd be "no safety catastrophes".
Preclinical trials in animals preceded human treatment preparations. The ethics committee approved trials before final preclinical results emerged, though.
Days after the treatment last March, the girl developed severe complications. She experienced high fever alongside signs of kidney damage. She was rushed to intensive care but ultimately died. These reported details, however, remain unverified at the moment.
Officials later fined the hospital roughly $3,600 ( ₹3.4 lakh) for oversight failures. The lead doctor received informal verbal counselling as an additional consequence. Neither penalty was substantial, given the severity of the outcomes.
Parents only learned of the Nature publication this past February. That paper described the research without mentioning the human trial.
It also omitted any reference to their daughter's tragic death. They demanded investigation and retraction, fearing false hope elsewhere. The university reportedly denied their retraction request outright, according to CNN.
Parents reportedly paid $860,000 ( ₹8.2 crore) towards developing this experimental treatment. They claim doctors never warned them that death was one of the possibilities.
They hoped that treatment would correct their daughter's genetic defect. This defect caused developmental delays, worrying them for her future. The hospital's ethics board concluded death was "definitely related" to treatment, CNN reported.
However, penalties remained minor, and outcomes were never publicly disclosed. This happened despite related research being published in Nature.
Nature’s deputy editor Victoria Aranda has told CNN, “No information that a human trial was planned or ongoing was ever shared with us, nor was any data related to human therapy shared or mentioned in any version of the submitted study.”
This case has sparked significant outrage across Chinese scientific communities. It follows tighter rules after a major scandal in 2018.
That scandal involved gene-edited embryos from scientist He Jiankui. Current gene therapy differs in that it does not affect future generations.
Experts consider this new case particularly concerning for several reasons. Unlike previous cases, it involves well-established scientists at prestigious institutions.
Global health expert Yanzhong Huang noted “persistent gaps” despite years of regulatory promises. A senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations in the US called it potentially "the tip of the iceberg" broadly.
China's share of global clinical trials has grown dramatically recently. Experts remain divided on whether stricter governance might have helped.
Some worry that overcorrection could stifle scientific innovation moving forward. Others insist ethical safeguards remain essential alongside competitive ambitions.
Sounak Mukhopadhyay covers trending news, sports and entertainment for LiveMint. His reporting focuses on fast-moving stories, box office performance, digital culture and major cricket developments. He combines real-time updates with clear context for everyday readers. <br><br> Sounak brings newsroom experience across breaking news, explainers and long-form features. He has a strong emphasis on accuracy, verification and responsible storytelling. His work tracks audience behaviour, celebrity influence and the business of sport and cinema. He helps readers understand why a story matters beyond the headline. <br><br> Sounak has contributed to widely read digital publications. He continues to build a body of journalism shaped by consistency, speed and editorial clarity. He is particularly interested in the intersection of media, popular culture and public conversation in contemporary India. <br><br> At LiveMint, he writes daily coverage as well as analytical pieces that interpret numbers, trends and cultural moments in accessible language. His approach prioritises factual depth, balanced framing and reader trust. The reporting aligns with modern newsroom standards of transparency and credibility. <br><br> Outside daily reporting, he explores storytelling across formats including podcasts, filmmaking and narrative non-fiction. Through his journalism, Sounak aims to document the rhythms of modern entertainment and sports while maintaining rigorous editorial integrity. <br><br> Sounak continues to develop audience-focused journalism that connects speed with substance in a rapidly-changing information environment. His work seeks clarity, trust and lasting public value in every story he reports.
Oops! Looks like you have exceeded the limit to bookmark the image. Remove some to bookmark this image.