
US President Donald Trump offered sharply conflicting signals on Monday about the trajectory of the United States-Israeli war against Iran. He first suggested the campaign was nearly complete, “very complete, pretty much,” before warning hours later that American forces could escalate their attacks if Tehran attempted to disrupt global energy supplies.
Earlier Monday, Trump appeared to indicate that the campaign had already achieved much of its objective. In a phone interview with CBS News reporter Weijia Jiang, the president characterised the operation as largely finished.
“The war is very complete, pretty much,” Trump said. He added, “We’re very far ahead of schedule.”
Those remarks briefly calmed global energy markets, which had been shaken by fears that the conflict could spread across the Middle East. Oil prices, which had surged overnight amid concerns about supply disruptions, fell after the interview.
Yet the apparent signal of de-escalation proved short-lived.
Later in the day, after financial markets had closed, Trump adopted a far more combative tone during a gathering of Republican lawmakers in Florida.
“We have won in many ways, but not enough,” Trump told the audience. “We go forward more determined than ever to achieve ultimate victory that will end this long-running danger once and for all.”
Speaking again to reporters Monday evening, the president warned of severe consequences if Iranian leaders attempted to block global oil flows, particularly through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.
“We will hit them so hard that it will not be possible for them or anybody else helping them to ever recover that section of the world,” Trump said.
When asked whether the war might end within days, the president offered a vague timetable: “No.” He added only “soon, very soon.”
Meanwhile, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth appeared far from signalling an end to the Iran war, emphasising that the campaign had only just begun.
The volatility in Trump's messaging was mirrored in global commodity markets. The international benchmark crude price, which had sat below $70 a barrel the previous month, briefly surged to nearly $120 late on Sunday night before retreating following a statement from the Group of Seven nations that they were actively exploring intervention to stabilise prices. A further slide came on the back of Trump's morning remarks to CBS, with the benchmark ultimately closing below $90.
Trump claimed in the CBS interview that the Strait of Hormuz had reopened to maritime traffic — an assertion flatly contradicted by international shipping monitors, who reported the waterway remained effectively closed. The president also said he was "thinking about taking it over," though the White House did not clarify what such a move would entail.
As the conflict entered its tenth day, US and Israeli forces have conducted more than 3,000 airstrikes, according to Trump's own figures, killing approximately 1,300 people in Iran, per Iranian officials. Israeli military sources put the toll at more than 1,900. Iranian retaliatory strikes across the broader region have killed more than 30 people.
In a development that drew Trump's public displeasure, senior Iranian clerics formally appointed Mojtaba Khamenei — son of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed on the first day of the war — as his father's successor. Trump had previously declared any such appointment "unacceptable." "I was disappointed," he said Monday, "because we think it's going to lead to more of the same problem for the country." He declined to answer directly when asked whether Mojtaba Khamenei might face the same fate as his father.
The appointment was celebrated by Iran's military and hard-line political establishment, though in Tehran itself, opponents were reported to have chanted "Death to Mojtaba" from their windows overnight — a reflection of widespread if carefully suppressed dissent.
In a significant diplomatic development, Trump spoke by telephone with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday — the first such exchange since the outbreak of the Iran war. The Kremlin said the call lasted approximately an hour and was described by Putin's foreign policy adviser, Yuri Ushakov, as "frank" and "businesslike." Ushakov said Putin presented Trump with "several proposals" for ending the conflict.
Russia's status as a key Iranian ally has raised considerable concern in Washington. White House envoy Steve Witkoff told reporters on Saturday that he had communicated directly to Russian officials that sharing intelligence with Iran would be unacceptable. Trump downplayed the prospect of Russian assistance to Tehran, though the administration's public statements on the matter have remained measured.
Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, took to social media to celebrate the spike in oil prices, branding the allied assault on his country "Operation Epic Mistake" and warning: "We, too, have many surprises in store."
Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister, Kazem Gharibabadi, separately confirmed on state television that France, China, and Russia had all reached out to discuss potential ceasefire conditions. The White House had not responded to requests for comment on those contacts at the time of publication.
In Lebanon, Israeli strikes killed almost 500 people and displaced more than 600,000, according to President Joseph Aoun. Israeli forces have pushed into southern Lebanon in response to rocket fire from Iranian-backed Hezbollah militants, bombarding strongholds across the south of the country.
Saudi Arabia announced it had intercepted drone and ballistic missile attacks targeting the kingdom's vast Shaybah oil field, the capital Riyadh, and a Saudi air base. In Bahrain, the state-owned energy company declared force majeure, announcing it could no longer fulfil existing contracts owing to the ongoing fighting and a recent attack on its refinery complex.
Turkey reported that NATO air defences had intercepted a ballistic missile launched from Iran on Monday — the second such incident in six days. The Turkish defence ministry said a previous Iranian missile, launched on 4 March, had targeted the Incirlik Air Base in southern Turkey. Iran denied deliberately targeting Turkish territory and had yet to comment publicly on Monday's incident. Under the NATO treaty, an attack on one member state constitutes an attack on all — a threshold that Western officials have not yet publicly invoked.
In Israel itself, at least one person was killed during an Iranian missile strike on Monday morning, according to Magen David Adom, the country's emergency medical service, raising the Israeli death toll to at least eleven since the war's outbreak.
Tehran has shown no indication of acceding to Trump's demand for unconditional surrender. With a new supreme leader installed, Iran's military apparatus continues to fire missiles and drones at neighbouring states. Its foreign ministry officials are publicly boasting of the economic damage being inflicted upon global energy markets.
What remains conspicuously absent — despite more than a week of intensive aerial bombardment and mounting casualties on all sides — is any coherent public articulation from Washington of what a post-war settlement might look like, or what conditions Iran would need to meet for hostilities to cease.
Sayantani Biswas is an assistant editor at Livemint with seven years of experience covering geopolitics, foreign policy, international relations and global power dynamics. She reports on Indian and international politics, including elections worldwide, and specialises in historically grounded analysis of contemporary conflicts and state decisions. She joined Mint in 2021, after covering politics at publications including The Telegraph. <br> She holds an MPhil in Comparative Literature from Jadavpur University (2019), with a specialisation in postcolonial Latin American literature. Her research examined economic nationalism through Eduardo Galeano’s Open Veins of Latin America. She also writes on political language, cultural memory and the long shadows of conflict. <br> Biswas grew up in Durgapur, an industrial town in West Bengal shaped by migration, which drew families from across India to the Durgapur Steel Plant. As the only child in a joint family, she spent years listening—almost obsessively—to her grandparents’ testimonies of struggle, fear and loss as they fled Bangladesh during the Partition of 1947. This formative exposure to lived historical memory later converged with her training in Comparative Literature, equipping her to analyse socio-economic structures and their reverberations. <br> Outside the newsroom, she gravitates towards cultural history and critical theory, returning often to texts such as Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. As a journalist, she is committed to accuracy, intellectual rigour and fairness, and believes political reporting demands not only clarity and speed, but historical depth, contextual precision, and a disciplined resistance to spectacle.