A pragmatic fiscal stimulus package that nudges households to spend3 min read . Updated: 13 Oct 2020, 09:01 AM IST
- India is in a very tight space, and the room to spend our way out of this crisis is very limited
A far more confident, poised and assertive Nirmala Sitharaman looked nothing like the fumbling FM just a few months ago when she announced the first fiscal package. The almost ₹1 trillion of spending plus infra push announced can be criticized by arguing that the government is not really spending anything much. And where is the ₹10 trillion that all the NRI economists are so fond of recommending? But if we stop being attached to seeing an actual spend from the government coffers and look at what the FM is trying to do, putting our political biases aside, then the story that emerges looks like this to me.
First, the package announced is this: Central government and central government enterprise employees can choose to either lapse their LTA this financial year or get the benefit in cash equal to leave encashment plus three times ticket fare. ₹10,000 worth of festival advance will be available for all such employees. State governments and the private sector can also do the same. For an infrastructure push, a ₹12,000 crore zero-interest 50-year loan to the states is being given and another ₹25,000 crore as a capital expenditure boost to the existing ₹4.13 trillion already announced in Budget 2020-21. The value of these measures is about ₹1 trillion. The sleight of hand is that this will be spent without the government actually spending that much more.
And now the story: India is in a very tight space with government revenues, and the room to spend our way out of this crisis is very limited. India is not a hard currency country that can print its way out, the way that the US or UK is doing. The small amount of monetization of the debt, or printing of currency, should not be used up in the beginning but should be saved for maximum bang for the buck, especially when the avenues to spend are limited with the lockdown not fully lifted. How do you get people who can afford to spend to spend? The way out has been to try and nudge the sections of the population in government and organized sector white-collar jobs to spend. The rising stock markets, the oversubscribed IPOs, the swelling FD coffers, the payback of debts are all pointing to one part of India being flush with funds as salaries either remained stable or were not cut that much. With reduced spending, savings have gone up for a section of Indians and the FM is trying to get these people to spend.
There is a pragmatism to the announcements that keep in mind the huge bill fudging industry in every department, and make it mandatory for transactions to be digital and not in cash. The money needs to be spent on a GST-compliant vendor for goods that attract 12% GST or more. This ensures that the money is actually spent on higher-value goods, so that the government garners GST on these sales and this also stimulates demand. When we speak of nudges and look appreciatively at the West for using these in policy, we should see a nudge in India when it happens. What this nudge is doing is this: every eligible household will now make the calculation on whether or not it is worth letting go of the LTA benefit or spend now to avail it. Similarly, the use of a prepaid RuPay card to spend the festival advance is a smart way to ensure that the money is actually spent and that the government will get the GST revenue on it.
The 50-year zero-interest loan for infra spending is a good deal in financial terms for states. The future value of ₹100 after 50 years at just a 4% rate is above ₹700. But the state will have to pay back just ₹100. The catch—states have to spend it by 31 March. Half the money is to be given now and the next half after the first has been spent. It needs to be spent on infra, for settlement of contractor bills of ongoing projects and for asset creation.
The stock market sulked a bit initially when the stimulus it had been expecting did not come through but settled down as the measures were digested. The desire to not upset the fiscal cart too much and spend as if every rupee matters is obvious in the last line of the FM: “Today’s solution should not cause tomorrow’s problem." Good fiscal hygiene or a display of confidence that the BJP will be in the seat of power for the foreseeable future?
Monika Halan is Consulting Editor at Mint and writes on household finance, policy and regulation.