Home >Opinion >Columns >Anxiety about gaming should be over money and not morals

It’s tempting to mark last week’s news of video-game restrictions in China and a UK law intended to make the internet safer for children as just another episode in the long, ludicrous history of moral panic in gaming. Over the decades, depictions of pixellated blood, virtual car-jackings and sex with aliens have sparked all kinds of outrage that would seem quaint today. Arcade classic Space Invaders was once described in UK Parliament as an addictive trigger for “theft, blackmail and vice."

Yet, some of the growing anxiety over gaming’s gambling-style mechanics, data collection and exploitative business practices is justified. Especially considering that after a pandemic boost, the industry has become bigger than movies and sports combined. China’s approach looks uniquely extreme, but even in the U.S. and Europe it seems like self-regulation will only go so far.

The focus of the UK’s ‘Children’s Code’ on specific data-privacy standards for under-18s is a step in the right direction, even if it’s only a starting point. The proliferation of free-to-play apps squeezing billions out of downloadable add-ons and other forms of gaming ‘hypermonetization’ rely on rich seams of user data, often mined from kids.

This can be a competitive advantage, as Joost van Dreunen’s book, One Up, points out. But it also brings the harms of data breaches, advertising targeted at minors and addictive gameplay loops that hook players the wrong way. One game developer compared the power of data-driven profiling to handing a “micro-targeted cigarette" to vulnerable smokers. The boundaries between gaming and gambling are also getting blurred. The industry is right alongside financial-trading and sports-betting apps in using cuddly graphics and dopamine-stimulating reward systems to keep customers hooked. The UK government is even considering whether to regulate loot boxes— virtual treasure chests you buy to get randomized goodies for use in games—as gambling products. Belgium and the Netherlands have already declared them illegal.

Although loot boxes are often described as “surprise mechanics" by the likes of Electronics Arts Inc, akin to a Kinder Egg, a research project earlier this year found they can encourage what looks like problematic gambling behaviour. They are estimated to generate $20 billion annually by 2025, according to Juniper Research.

Consumer harm will be an ongoing issue as financial rewards continue to flow into gaming. Thanks to the pandemic, more of our lives are spent online, and tech firms’ ambition to combine always-on virtual worlds into an immersive ‘metaverse’ will bring some hair-raising possibilities.

Gaming platform sensation Roblox Corp’s digital Lego-style worlds clearly inspire fun and creativity. But its creator economy is also tied to the labour of under-13s (54% of users) and developers who receive a nominal 25% cut for their efforts. The firm has pointed to hundreds of developers who earn over $85,000 a year from it, yet it’s unnerving to see one disillusioned 11-year-old take to YouTube to say people are being “lied to" about how easy it is to be successful on the platform.

It won’t be long before we see the same play-to-earn mechanics seen in crypto-fuelled games like Axie Infinity, which rewards players for breeding and battling digital monsters, going mainstream.

Even if more scrutiny on the gaming industry makes sense, it’s hard to see the benefit of China’s regulatory approach, which combines censorship, paternalism and protectionism without taking into account the benefits of gaming. Better for regulators to focus on practices that carry privacy and financial risks to under-age gamers, including game mechanics that resemble gambling.

For the time being, game publishers’ stock prices look fairly resilient, even if moves like China’s are seen as a threat to chunky valuations like Roblox’s, according to Mirabaud analyst Neil Campling. But investors talking the talk on ESG concerns should be more willing to walk the walk on gaming. And there’s a long way to go here. Bloomberg Intelligence’s Matthew Kanterman cites recent high-profile departures at gaming companies linked to allegations of sexual misconduct, as well as slow progress in the sector’s workforce diversity.

Companies know which way the regulatory wind’s blowing. Just look at Epic’s purchase of kid-tech platform SuperAwesome, which aims to build “kid-safe services." Political pressure is not going away: Loot boxes and in-game purchases respectively score a net concern of 62% and 51% among UK members of parliament, according to Greenstone Research polling.

Making money from games is clearly not going to be as easy as getting kids to pump coins into an arcade machine. Maybe that’s just as well.

Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering the European Union and France

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters
* Enter a valid email
* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Never miss a story! Stay connected and informed with Mint. Download our App Now!!

Edit Profile
My ReadsRedeem a Gift CardLogout