OPEN APP
Home >Opinion >Columns >Inflation will force the Fed to rethink its loose money policy

The problems faced by US President Joe Biden would be formidable for anyone. There’s the political schism that won’t be cured by optimistic calls for unity. Then there’s the herculean challenge of stopping covid from killing too many more people in America. High up on his list, and sooner rather than later, will be dealing with the consequences of the biggest financial bubble in US history. Why the biggest? Because it encompasses not just stocks but pretty much every other financial asset too. And for that, you may thank the Federal Reserve.

The fallout of the Fed’s encouragement of investors to buy horribly overpriced assets will be every bit as difficult as coming off the gold standard in the early 1970s, or tackling runaway inflation in the early 1980s. It will require an act of political will and a complete rethink of monetary policy. Having Janet Yellen, a former Fed chair, as treasury secretary is unlikely to help. She was among a long line of Fed bosses, from Alan Greenspan on, who reacted to each crisis by slashing interest rates, and, over the last decade or so, massively expanding the US central bank’s balance sheet.

By coming to the rescue every time in the manner it did, the Federal Reserve created the conditions for the current bubble—and the next crisis.

That game is now over. Little noticed last week amid the copious commentary on the GameStop jollity was a data release showing the Fed’s preferred measure of consumer inflation is going up. Over the past 12 months, core personal consumption expenditure rose 1.5%, higher than the 1.3% expected. Admittedly, this is still low, but it’s likely to go up a lot further. The Fed is monetizing much of the government deficit; the monster amount of money that it created is finding its way out of the banking system; there are severe supply constraints in both manufacturing and services; and Asia is on fire.

Consider what data charts reveal. Sean Wolpert, a former colleague of mine at Rubicon Fund Management, has compared the price pressures in ISM surveys (manufacturing and non-manufacturing) with subsequent consumer price inflation. Even without a sharp recovery in demand, inflation is already rising, and these two surveys are a very good predictor of where it will head next.

Rapidly rising inflation will eventually force the Fed to rein in its lax monetary policy. But it will move, by its own admission, very slowly; on my interpretation much too slowly. It’s a racing certainty that markets will be spooked much earlier than the US central bank.

Central bankers the world over seem to be the only people who don’t see signs of wild excess wherever they look. Most investments are almost certainly going to lose money over the next few years. On the measures that matter—you know, the ones that actually predict returns—the US stock market is as expensive as it was in 1929, 2001, and the lead-up to the Global Financial Crisis of 2008-09.

All stock-market bubbles go hand-in-hand with rapid credit growth, and this latest one is no exception. Non-financial corporate debt has been on a tear these few years past, relative to US gross domestic product (GDP). Part of the reason last year, of course, was the rapid fall in GDP, although the Fed also played its part by buying billions of dollars of corporate debt.

At least when stock markets went south in those earlier periods, investors could plonk their money in government debt because they offered yields. In the early 1990s, lest we forget, Japanese 10-year yields briefly touched 8%. They don’t have quaint things like interest rates in Europe or Japan any more, thanks to their respective central banks. The 1.1% available on 10-year US Treasuries looks breathtakingly meagre, too.

It’s probably an even worse idea for investors to buy corporate debt, especially lower-rated issuance. Spreads on company debt over government bonds are also desperately low, which means that corporate debt yields are at record lows. Yields on borrowers rated CCC or less—the lowest ranks of junk before default—have never been lower.

If investors are about to face a crisis, so too is the White House and the American central bank. It wouldn’t take much movement from the Fed to upset markets, hence its desire to move carefully. On the other hand, doing nothing is also problematic from a political perspective. Inflation is regressive: It hurts poor people far more than rich ones. That doesn’t look like a model of social justice.

Reasonable people can disagree, but I think we will find out how much of a hole the Federal Reserve has dug for itself, and for markets and America in the next three months.

Richard Cookson was former head of research and fund manager at Rubicon Fund Management.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters
* Enter a valid email
* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Never miss a story! Stay connected and informed with Mint. Download our App Now!!

Close
×
Edit Profile
My ReadsRedeem a Gift CardLogout