Home / Opinion / Columns /  RBI must come clean where it stands on climate change

The past few weeks have seen incessant rains inundating Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg districts of coastal Maharashtra. An overflowing Vashishti river in Chiplun town even submerged buses in the state transport complex. Over 200 people have lost their lives in Maharashtra due to landslides, floods and other rain-related accidents. Elsewhere in India, heavy rains set off landslides in mountainous Himachal Pradesh, with cascading boulders killing tourists and residents. In Bihar, rain-fed Gandak river has washed away Motihari and East Champaran districts. The Maharashtra government’s preliminary estimates of loss to property, business and infrastructure is around 4,000 crore, with the final figure likely to be higher.

India is not the only country ravaged by these extreme weather incidents. Heat waves in Canada and the north-west coast of the US—with temperatures reaching 50° Celsius—have killed close to 500 people. Uncharacteristic rains flooded Germany and Belgium, claiming about 200 lives. Similar abnormal rains and flooding in central China affected 2 million citizens and resulted in economic losses of over $500 million.

Climate change, undoubtedly, is responsible for these extreme fluctuations in weather patterns, characterised by long dry and hot spells interspersed with short bursts of heavy rainfall, causing economic damage and loss of lives. These episodes of extreme weather variations result in supply chain disruptions, business continuity problems, labour productivity diminution, lower investment rates, contraction in collateral values, and defaults by businesses and households, leading to problems of overall financial instability.

The International Monetary Fund’s Global Financial Stability Report of 2019 also highlighted these risks: “The potential impact of climate risks is large, nonlinear, and hard to estimate. Losses from climate-related risks affect the financial system directly, through price impairment, reduced collateral values, and underwriting losses, and indirectly, through lower economic growth and tighter financial conditions. Insurance claims from natural losses have already quadrupled since the 1980s."

This is a situation custom-built for central bank intervention. Most central banks have been working to assess financial system risks from climate change, figuring out how to design stress-testing maps and trying to finalise risk mitigation models. The Network for Greening of the Financial System (NGFS) was set up during the 2017 Paris ‘One Planet Summit’ for central banks and supervisors to share best practices in climate-related risk management practices. The network already has 95 central banks as members and 15 multilateral financial institutions as observers. As economic historian Adam Tooze has written, “In light of far-reaching national commitments to achieving net zero by 2050, a wide-ranging re-examination of financial stability regulation and monetary policy tools is under way."

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) joined NGFS in April 2021, a laggard among the major G20 central banks. In its July bulletin, RBI tipped its hat at the need for monetary-policy frameworks to incorporate climate-change risks, but refrained from explicitly expressing a desire to re-examine its own monetary policy framework or indicating whether it is moving in that direction. RBI faces two peculiar challenges that will test its resolve in the days ahead.

The first is India’s unique and differentiated position in the climate change battle when compared with developed nations. Rich countries and their institutions are marching ahead with their agenda of net zero emissions by 2050, which is at odds with India’s developmental challenges. A recent conference on the financial sector’s climate change related risks—Green Swan 2021, organized jointly by Bank for International Settlements (the central bank for all central banks), NGFS, the International Monetary Fund and Bank of France—was mostly a rich country affair, with very little representation from island nations which face inundation threats from rising sea levels, or, sub-Saharan African nations where climate change threatens agriculture-based livelihoods. RBI will have to leverage its NGFS membership to access global best practices, but will also have to tweak the framework to suit India’s development imperatives. In addition, it will also have to act as a champion for other developing and poor nations by developing an alternative but sustainable model.

The second challenge lies within. Like all other central banks, RBI is bound by a mandate fixed by the legislative. The preamble to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, states that monetary policy’s “primary" objective is price stability, “while keeping in mind the objective of growth". This could skew RBI’s attempts to foster a green financing compact within the Indian financial system. Many financial initiatives in India will have obvious adverse environmental consequences but will likely find RBI on the horns of a dilemma: balancing its NGFS commitments versus its constitutional mandate of fostering “growth". RBI will, therefore, have to either seek legislative amendments or establish a legitimate work-around. Either way, it can no longer afford to ignore the compelling imperatives of green financing or overlook how climate change is slowly but surely eroding financial stability.

Rajrishi Singhal is a policy consultant, journalist and author. His Twitter handle is @rajrishisinghal.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters
* Enter a valid email
* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Never miss a story! Stay connected and informed with Mint. Download our App Now!!

Edit Profile
My ReadsRedeem a Gift CardLogout