Indian democracy’s power-sharing problem1 min read . Updated: 16 Jul 2019, 09:04 PM IST
- This power-sharing among the different groups, though, has not happened in India, suggests a study by Katharine Adeney and Wilfried Swenden
- To show this, the authors analyse different political and administrative institutions in India
MUMBAI : India’s enduring democracy, despite entrenched social fault-lines based on caste, class, and religion, has fascinated social scientists from across the world. One common explanation for the survival of democracy in countries with divided societies is that institutional power, either through the executive, judiciary and legislature or through informal channels, is shared among different groups.
This explanation, formally defined as “consociationalism" by political scientists, also suggests that groups are granted some form of autonomy—such as cultural, economical or territorial autonomy. This power-sharing among the different groups, though, has not happened in India, suggests a study by Katharine Adeney and Wilfried Swenden.
To show this, the authors analyse different political and administrative institutions in India. They find that, though other backward classes (OBCs) have slightly increased their representation in cabinets, the Lok Sabha and senior political offices, other religious and caste minorities are underrepresented.
These minorities are allotted the less important portfolios and also wield less power within the party structure. Certain constituencies are reserved for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, but their representation often does not extend beyond the Lok Sabha.
Similar biases exist in the case of administration and judicial appointments, they suggest. They also find that this underrepresentation is present under both the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) regimes. However, the authors note that Muslim representation has further weakened under the BJP.
More generally, they argue that the rise of majoritarianism and a Hindu nationalistic party in recent years may weaken power-sharing in Indian democracy and further erode the stance towards minorities.
They argue for the need for constitutional and legal provisions of power-sharing to protect minority rights.
Snap Fact features new and interesting reads from the world of research