Active Stocks
Tue Apr 16 2024 15:59:30
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 160.05 -0.53%
  1. Infosys share price
  2. 1,414.75 -3.65%
  1. NTPC share price
  2. 359.40 -0.54%
  1. State Bank Of India share price
  2. 751.90 -0.65%
  1. HDFC Bank share price
  2. 1,509.40 0.97%
Business News/ Politics / Policy/  How unique are preferential trade agreements?
BackBack

How unique are preferential trade agreements?

A large portion of the content of preferential trade agreements is copied word for word from earlier agreements, finds a study

Preferential trade agreements, which are meant to be individually-tailored agreements, are largely replications of earlier agreements (Mint file)Premium
Preferential trade agreements, which are meant to be individually-tailored agreements, are largely replications of earlier agreements (Mint file)

A trade agreement can take months to negotiate, but the agreement itself may end up being remarkably similar to existing agreements. According to new research, preferential trade agreements (PTAs), which are meant to be individually-tailored agreements granting preferential access of products to certain countries, are largely replications of earlier agreements.

In the study, Todd Allee and Manfred Elsig use text analysis tools to examine PTAs from around the world and find that most PTAs’ content is copied word for word from earlier agreements. According to their analysis, at least 100 PTAs take over 80% of their contents directly from a single, existing treaty—with many copying and pasting 95% or more. Where agreements include topics such as anti-dumping and safeguards, which have been covered extensively in earlier agreements over the years, such copy-pasting is even higher.

Interestingly, the authors find that this copy-pasting is more common in agreements involving post-communist countries and signed in the early to mid-1990s. These countries would have had little experience negotiating free trade agreements. They argue that these countries might find it attractive to copy and paste as an efficiency short-cut. But they also argue that the more powerful countries, like the US, are also likely to replicate their preferred templates, especially when the treaty partner is significantly weaker.

For instance, they found that the US-Colombia agreement (2006) copies the same language that was used previously in the US-Chile agreement (2003)—with only minor tweaks in terms of numbering, proper nouns and language.

A common worry about the trend from multilateral to bilateral agreements is that it will lead to greater legal fragmentation. But the authors suggest that, if legal language is highly replicated, adding more treaties may not necessarily lead to fragmentation.

Also read: Are the Contents of International Treaties Copied and Pasted? Evidence from Preferential Trade Agreements

Snap Fact features new and interesting reads from the world of research

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Catch all the Politics News and Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.
More Less
Published: 24 Jul 2019, 03:14 PM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App