Scatter and survive: Inside US military shift to deny China ‘big, juicy’ targets

Analysts say the U.S. isn’t investing anywhere near enough in infrastructure, and military construction isn’t moving as fast as it needs to. (via REUTERS)
Analysts say the U.S. isn’t investing anywhere near enough in infrastructure, and military construction isn’t moving as fast as it needs to. (via REUTERS)

Summary

America is upgrading far-off runways and reviving World War II airfields to counter the threat of China’s enormous missile arsenal.

The remote Pacific airfield used to launch the atomic bombings of Japan during World War II is being revived with a different foe in mind: China.

Runways emerging from the encroaching jungles on the tiny island of Tinian, a U.S. territory, are part of a sweeping shift in how America’s military would respond to a possible conflict in Asia.

Instead of relying on a few large air bases, the U.S. would disperse its warplanes to make them less vulnerable to China’s enormous arsenal of missiles. That means identifying, upgrading and reviving airstrips across the Indo-Pacific that could be pressed into service.

The U.S. Air Force calls this effort Agile Combat Employment, or ACE, and the rebuilding on Tinian is a key piece of that.

Reclaiming a World War II-era airfield largely obscured by thick, emerald-green jungle on a tiny Pacific island is no simple task.

In recent months, red-capped crews from the U.S. Air Force have trudged through the dense foliage with machetes and GPS devices. Their task: to mark the boundaries of the 8,500-foot-long erstwhile runways, based on black-and-white images and maps from the 1940s.

They encountered yellow-streaked spiders, swarms of bees and stifling humidity. Hulking excavators knocked down swaths of trees, averaging 117 truckloads a day. On their best day, the crews cleared an area the size of nearly eight football fields.

“The density was tough, very tough," said Master Sgt. Jody Branson, the operations superintendent, who belongs to the Air Force’s 513th Expeditionary Red Horse Squadron. “If me and you walked back there, we could be 10 feet apart and not even see each other."

For decades, the U.S. didn’t need the airfield. It consolidated its presence at a small number of large air bases—in Japan and on the American territory of Guam, for instance. It can no longer afford to do so. In a conflict, China could direct its significant firepower at those well-known bases to destroy aircraft, crater runways and cripple U.S. air power.

To prevent that from happening, the U.S. would switch to a different posture during a crisis. Aircraft would scatter across an array of airfields in the Indo-Pacific—be it full-fledged bases belonging to allies, lone airstrips on far-out islands or even runways at civilian airports. They would hop between the different locations to keep China guessing and increase their chances of survival.

The point is to “not consolidate all of our aircraft into one big, juicy target," said Michael Winkler, deputy director of air and cyberspace operations for the Pacific Air Forces. “There’s a dispersal aspect to it, and then there’s flexibility as well where aircraft aren’t specifically tied to one base."

If that sounds straightforward, it isn’t. Keeping smaller units supplied across disparate, distant and bare-bones locations is hard. There is another distance problem: The farther aircraft spread out from the main battlefield, the harder it can be for them to contribute to the fight.

Adopting a more dispersed posture also means the U.S. needs a lot more options for places it could use to land, take off and project power in a crisis. How many? As many as possible, said Winkler.

“We’re interested in any runways, basically," he said. “If you’ve got 7,000-plus feet of runway, we’ll look at that as a potential operating base."

That list consists of several dozen sites across the vast region, he said, adding: “We’ve got a big map, it’s got a lot of airfields plotted in it, and we’d dearly love to get to as many of those as possible."

Some of them are on U.S. territories, such as Tinian, but most aren’t—including vital places close to Taiwan, the region’s most dangerous potential flashpoint. Japan and the Philippines, for instance, are home to a number of military installations and commercial runways to which aircraft could potentially disperse. The large Philippine island of Luzon alone hosts six or seven suitable airfields, Winkler said.

That means in a conflict, Washington would need to have tricky discussions with allies and friendly governments for wartime access to their territories. Winkler said the U.S. military has decided not to push those conversations “up until the moment of that crisis."

“It’s an intentional move we’re making in the competition phase," he said, referring to the current state of U.S.-China relations, in contrast to a potential conflict or crisis phase. “Trying to not make our allies and partners choose and make a very, very difficult choice between probably an economic partner of choice and a military partner of choice."

For now, the U.S. is sending its airmen out to as many potentially useful sites as possible to get a lay of the land. At a number of spots, it is laying the groundwork to make facilities more suited for U.S. use. It is measuring runways, building new ramps, warehouses and fueling infrastructure, and training to operate with lean teams from austere locations.

Upgrading airfields

U.S. budget documents, interviews with Air Force officials and visits to military sites at Tinian, Guam and northern Australia show where and how the effort is unfolding.

On Basa Air Base in the Philippines, the U.S. is financing a taxiway and a parking apron sized to accommodate American aircraft, after upgrading the runway and building a warehouse. Basa is one of nine Philippine military sites—four of which were added last year—under a deal that gives U.S. forces access to rotate through and to build infrastructure.

On Tinian, in addition to rebuilding North Field, the U.S. is bulking up the international airport with new taxiways and parking space for up to 12 refueling aircraft, budget documents show. The site is intended as a secondary fuel hub with storage tanks and pipelines in case the U.S.’s closest large base, on the island of Guam, is damaged.

On Guam itself, military crews are rehabilitating another World War II-era airfield so that aircraft can spread out across different points on the same island. About 500 miles southwest on coral-fringed Yap, a Micronesian island, the Air Force has proposed a $400 million runway extension to operate “in the event that access to other western Pacific locations is limited or denied," according to budget documents.

Airfield improvements are planned over the next few years on the tourist island of Saipan and on at least two sites in the archipelago nation of Palau.

Much of the digging and paving at the moment is taking place in an arc called the Second Island Chain, which includes a smattering of territories the U.S. controls as well as countries where the U.S. has military access. For American forces, the task of upgrading infrastructure and prepositioning supplies at these locations is easier than at sites in the First Island Chain, which spans Japan, the Philippines and Taiwan.

The First Island Chain is valuable because it lies closer to China, but the U.S. is more dependent on foreign governments there and political winds can more easily shift.

Farther out, Washington is pumping money into two northern Australian air bases. At Darwin, it has built fuel storage and is making a squadron operations facility. U.S.-funded fuel storage is also going up at a base at Tindal, and an apron and other infrastructure are planned so that the installation—which until now has catered to fighters—can accommodate B-52 bombers.

Positioning bombers in Australia would force Beijing to decide whether to use its most costly long-range missiles to hit targets that far away and possibly draw another U.S. ally into conflict.

Airmen are trying to get the hang of the new location-hopping reality.

In February, U.S. and allied aircraft bounced between six airfields on three islands: Guam, Saipan and Tinian. For the first time this year, the U.S.-led Valiant Shield exercises included U.S. fighters operating from the Japanese bases of Matsushima and Hachinohe. Both of them could, if Tokyo agreed, act as dispersal locations for U.S. aircraft in a contingency. In August, the U.S. deployed B-2 stealth bombers to an Australian air base near Brisbane, in the country’s east.

“Having American forces operating in smaller units in more locations reduces the likelihood that China can successfully launch a massive first strike," said Stacie Pettyjohn, a senior fellow and director of the defense program at the Center for a New American Security, a Washington-based think tank. “It will hopefully increase doubts in the minds" of the Chinese Communist Party that it can quickly and easily win a war," she said.

China’s firepower

Beijing’s military modernization has eroded U.S. dominance. Its arsenal of missiles has grown rapidly in number, range and accuracy. If China moved to invade democratically governed Taiwan—which it has vowed to take, by force if necessary—it could send volleys at the U.S.’s main air bases in the region to destroy aircraft and stop, or at least delay, American intervention.

For the U.S., this means the era of sanctuary at those bases is over.

Andersen is a strategic U.S. node. As many as 150 aircraft can park there, and it houses the Air Force’s largest fuel storage capacity anywhere. Airmen consider it a “gas and go."

On rotation at nearly all times are three or four tanker aircraft that can refuel other planes midflight. In the past 12 months, B-52 bombers have come to Andersen twice, for several weeks at a time. In February, more than 80 U.S. and allied aircraft descended on the base for exercises.

The U.S. military is developing more options to spread out aircraft—on Guam itself, and on the nearby islands of Tinian and Saipan.

It recently rehabilitated a short, underused airstrip at the U.S. Navy base on Guam and uses the island’s airport for exercises. At another site on Guam, Northwest Field, Air Force crews are rebuilding taxiways, clearing overgrown parking surfaces and throwing up a quick-build shelter that can double as a hangar.

The U.S. flew its last World War II combat mission, to destroy Japan’s oil facilities, from this location. One of its two runways was repaired last year, while the other—nicknamed Thunder—will be fixed likely starting next year. The asphalt is cracked, tufts of grass have broken through, and potholes make even a car ride backbreaking.

Northwest Field is envisioned as an austere site, which means it won’t have all the facilities of a base. When the Air Force needs it, mobile air-traffic-control teams would come out, establish communication with incoming aircraft, and help planes land and take off.

“It’s all about expanding capability, right? We want to stay flexible, stay agile," said Capt. Luke Eckstein, who is part of the team rehabilitating the airfield. “Two is better than one, six is better than five."

The question mark

Analysts say the U.S. isn’t investing anywhere near enough in infrastructure, and military construction isn’t moving as fast as it needs to. Fiscal constraints mean many projects sit on unfunded wish lists, competing priorities pit buying new aircraft against pouring concrete, and far-flung locations exacerbate bureaucratic and logistical hurdles.

“What we’re trying to do is hard," said Andrew Huntoon, deputy director of logistics, engineering and force protection for the Pacific Air Forces. He pointed out that the Air Force must navigate local rules around environment and cultural heritage, the remote locations of some of the bases and the regular design process.

Still, he said, the bottom line is that the U.S. needs to upgrade infrastructure. “We have some crumbling facilities in our area of responsibility," he said.

Another knotty problem is logistics—getting equipment, spare parts, fuel, munitions and support crew to locations scattered across the region, possibly under enemy attack. Part of the solution is to stock materiel ahead of time. But if hostilities broke out, the U.S. would still need to flow supplies to the right place at the right time while the pieces move across a dizzying chessboard.

“Having aircraft at an airfield doesn’t do me much good unless I’ve got maintainers to support those aircraft, potentially weapons to load on those aircraft in a combat scenario, gas to put in those aircraft and everything else," said Winkler, of the Pacific Air Forces. “It really is a full-up soup-to-nuts dispersal of all equipment across the theater that we need."

Aside from getting access from allies, logistics is the biggest question mark over the strategy, said Jacob Heim, a senior policy researcher at Rand, an American think tank. “In theory, from a survivability standpoint, you might want to be so dispersed you have two aircraft at every base, but there’s no way you could actually have the logistics to support the aircraft when they’re that widely dispersed," he said.

Symbols of war

The Air Force teams out on Tinian have glimpsed the difficulties. The island is less than 40 square miles and is home to around 2,000 people. It has a school, a public library, a medical center—no hospital. There is only one gas station. Rental equipment needs to be shipped or flown in from elsewhere.

“When you’re stuck waiting for parts, when you’re stuck waiting for stuff that’s on a boat or you have to get it here via certain aircraft—that’s the only way you can get it—it just takes time," said Maj. Blake Rothschild, commander of the squadron clearing the northern airfield.

When flying into Tinian, it is hard to imagine the scale of the U.S. mobilization eight decades ago. America sent thousands of Navy Seabees to carve what became a sprawling airfield, along with roads and other supporting infrastructure. Grainy images show broad strips of runway appearing within a few months, flanked by dozens of keyhole-shaped parking spots filled with aircraft.

Today, the island is studded with symbols of war. Not far from where the old runways are being revived is the bomb pit where the first atomic bomb ever to be dropped in combat was loaded onto an aircraft. Close by are air-raid shelters from an earlier era of Japanese occupation, before American forces took over Tinian. A restaurant where U.S. personnel now unwind over karaoke is decorated with military memorabilia.

At North Field, the small Air Force crew of around 30 people has spent months clearing out the jungle. Whether all four airstrips will ultimately be paved is being determined, the Air Force said.

“We’re writing the next chapter in history," said Rothschild. “We’re not sure what the end of that’s going to look like, though."

Note: The map on China’s missile arsenal shows maximum ranges, calculated from the borders of mainland China. Affected areas may be smaller.

Graphics sources: Planet Labs (Tinian satellite images); Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey—James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (China’s missile brigades); Defense Department (missile arsenal); Congressional Research Service (U.S. bases); Google Earth (Guam, Saipan and Tinian satellite images); staff reports

Write to Niharika Mandhana at niharika.mandhana@wsj.com, Mike Cherney at mike.cherney@wsj.com and Camille Bressange at camille.bressange@wsj.com

Scatter and Survive: Inside a U.S. Military Shift to Deny China ‘Big, Juicy’ Targets
View Full Image
Scatter and Survive: Inside a U.S. Military Shift to Deny China ‘Big, Juicy’ Targets
Scatter and Survive: Inside a U.S. Military Shift to Deny China ‘Big, Juicy’ Targets
View Full Image
Scatter and Survive: Inside a U.S. Military Shift to Deny China ‘Big, Juicy’ Targets
Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
more

topics

MINT SPECIALS