Global Soccer Is Now Openly at War With Itself

Joshua Robinson, The Wall Street Journal
3 min read11 Aug 2026, 04:27 PM IST
logo
FIFA president Gianni Infantino remains defiant despite growing pressure.
Summary
After officials in Europe and North America effectively called for the removal of FIFA’s Gianni Infantino, the sport is in a battle that could drag on for months.

The controversial plan to privatize and sell off parts of the World Cup was swept off the table over a week ago. Gianni Infantino, the embattled president of soccer’s world governing body, even apologized for proposing it in the first place.

But in the corridors of power that run the game in Europe and North America, one goal still remains. Officials who saw Infantino’s plan as merely the latest in a series of misguided, unilateral decisions now believe that the only solution is to remove Infantino from office.

View full Image
Infantino attended the inauguration of Abelardo De La Espriella as Colombia's president on Aug. 7.

The question now is whether Infantino’s opponents are even prepared to wait for the uncertainty of an election. If all three confederations who signed the letter voted as blocs, they would certainly have enough votes to oust him, controlling more than two-thirds of the FIFA membership. Only the exercise of corralling voters at FIFA makes herding cats look easy. The organization’s 211 members come with 211 highly specific sets of concerns. The only thing they have in common is that each of their votes counts the same. Germany, which has won the World Cup four times, has an identical say as Guam, whose men’s national team has never been ranked higher than No. 146 in the world.

And in each of the confederations cracks are already appearing. In Concacaf, the most notable country to remain in Infantino’s camp is Mexico, which initially said that his privatization plan known as FIFA Forward Enterprise, merited further consideration. And in Asia, at least half a dozen nations, including Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, have announced they would side with him in any vote.

The more immediate issues for Infantino’s rivals are the two deadlines creeping up in the next three months. The first is the Under-20 Women’s World Cup, a tournament that wouldn’t normally garner much attention. The difference now is that it will become a test of UEFA’s resolve, since it vowed to boycott any and all FIFA competitions until it saw meaningful change. Sticking to its promise would mean pulling out six European squads from the 24-team field and, possibly, organizing a parallel event in the interest of not punishing the players, according to a person familiar with UEFA’s thinking.

The other deadline will come in November, when Infantino’s opponents would need to enter a candidate to run against him. As things stand, however, Infantino is due to run unopposed, just as he did in 2023, when he was ushered back into office with one giant round of applause.

By now, it’s at least clear that Infantino can’t count on winning his third full term by acclamation. During his 10 days of damage control, he acknowledged that he had made mistakes and apologized for trying to press ahead with FIFA Forward Enterprise too quickly (something he tried while also attempting to expand the World Cup from 48 teams to 64).

But his opponents saw something else at play.

“[FIFA] treats this as a failure of communication,” the confederations wrote in Monday’s letter, “when what football witnessed was a failure of judgment.”

Stay updated with all the latest news and insights on Cricket, Football, and Tennis at Livemint Sports.

More