Home/ Technology / App News/  Meta’s Oversight Board sees spike in user appeals
Back

Meta’s Oversight Board sees spike in user appeals

Appeals that were made before the Oversight Board of Meta saw an increase by 66% sequentially in the March quarter

The increase in successful appeals against content moderation decisions by Meta buttresses the case for an independent regulator or a government-appointed appellate grievance committee as proposed in India (REUTERS)Premium
The increase in successful appeals against content moderation decisions by Meta buttresses the case for an independent regulator or a government-appointed appellate grievance committee as proposed in India (REUTERS)

NEW DELHI : An independent body which hears challenges to content moderation decisions taken by Meta has reported a high success rate of appeals, strengthening the case for such an entity for social media platforms.

Meta’s Oversight Board, which oversees appeals against the company’s content takedowns on Facebook and Instagram, said that in 14 out of 20 cases it reviewed, Meta acknowledged that its “original decision was incorrect."

Appeals before the board grew 66% in the March quarter sequentially. According to its latest transparency report, a total of 480,000 cases were filed with the Board during the period, up from 288,440 cases in the December quarter.

The increase in successful appeals against content moderation decisions by Meta buttresses the case for an independent regulator or a government-appointed appellate grievance committee as proposed in India.

The Oversight Board doesn’t look into every request and usually picks up cases that are common to set a wide precedent with its rulings.

Social media companies, on their part, are reportedly mulling a self-regulatory body to deal with challenges and users’ grievances. Such a body may function on the lines of the Oversight Board and make all social media companies more accountable with their recommendations.

Meta set up the Oversight Board in May 2020 to take an independent call on controversial content moderation decisions related to issues like hate speech. Though independent, the Board is funded by Meta through a trust. The company has so far committed $280 million to the trust for managing and running the Oversight Board’s affairs.

“A self regulatory body may be a welcome move as compared to internal regulatory mechanisms of each platform. In any event, the oversight committee or equivalent in the regulatory body would review the platform’s actions. The government also indicated that it may view this option favourably," said N.S. Nappinai, Supreme Court Advocate and founder of Cyber Saathi.

Though a self-regulatory body is not a bad idea, Nappinai noted that such a body would only have recommendatory powers and will not have enforcement authority. That will, in any event, always remain with the government.

India is among the largest markets for both Facebook (329 million) and Instagram (230 million) in terms of user base as of January 2022, according to Statista.

Many feel that a grievance appellate committee is a step in the direction to ensure that the decision to block an account doesn't end with social media companies. However, experts noted that such a committee has its issues.

“Whenever you have speech-related concerns, it's always going to be subjective. The only way to ensure some degree of objectivity is to ensure transparency or due process in decision-making. We need to ensure transparency or at least due process in the decision-making," said Trishee Goyal, research fellow at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy.

Goyal also noted that only a platform like Facebook can have something like an Oversight Board. Smaller platforms with limited resources, cannot institute such mechanisms.

Further, Prateek Waghre, policy director at the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) noted that there is still a lack of clarity on what structure the committee be made on. He pointed out that Meta’s Oversight Board has a discretion element in terms of the cases that it picks, while the appellate committee may be required to respond to all user complaints that are filed. This can increase their burden for them.

Waghre reminded that it is not clear if there will be a single committee body governing all companies, or if each company will have to set up its committee to comply with government requests.

Having said that, Waghre also noted that decisions taken by self-regulatory bodies or appellate committees in India may not affect decisions by Meta's Oversight Board.

“Since the Oversight Board picks and chooses its cases based on a broader narrative, the clash of decisions may not always be frequent. There could be a few cases where a decision taken in India could affect a global decision for the company," he added.

abhijit.ahaskar@livemint.com

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Abhijit Ahaskar
Abhijit writes on tech policy, gaming, security, AI, robotics, electronics and startups. He has been in the media industry for over 12 years.
Catch all the Technology News and Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.
More Less
Updated: 05 Aug 2022, 10:52 PM IST
Recommended For You
×
Get alerts on WhatsApp
Set Preferences My Reads Watchlist Feedback Redeem a Gift Card Logout