Supreme Court

Rahul Gandhi led an opposition protest in Delhi demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, while accusing him of making “illegal and unilateral” changes to Form 6, the application used for voter registration. The Election Commission has rejected the allegation as “misleading”, citing the unanimous approval of the Bihar SIR order and the Supreme Court’s May 2026 judgment. The Supreme Court has clarified that it did not approve any modified version of Form 6 and has sought records to establish who authorised or made the changes. While Gandhi’s allegation remains contested, the ECI’s response does not directly answer that specific question. The matter remains before the Supreme Court.

Trump's $100K H-1B Visa Fee UPHELD by Judge—Indians Hit Hardest! Ruling clears path for massive hike on new applications, pricing out entry-level pros (70%+ Indians). Chamber of Commerce loses challenge; 19 states sue separately—hospitals, schools face crisis. Lottery scrapped for salary-weighted system. End of American Dream for young Indian talent?

The Supreme Court of India, has in a ruling last week, held that a husband is legally liable to repay his wife's stock market debt of around ₹1.18 crore along with 9 per cent interest, based on a verbal contract. In its ruling, the apex court noted that a husband can be held “jointly and severally liable for his wife's stock market debts” on the basis of an oral contract and depending on the nature of their financial dealings, it said. We explain. This case has drawn a lot of attention - why exactly should a spouse have to be responsible - and can this happen to one of us today? In this video, we answer both questions!

A 5 judge bench headed by CJI Chandrachud today asked the SBI to disclose all details related to electoral bonds that allowed individuals and companies to make donations to political parties, including the serial number of each bond. Asking the SBI not to be selective in the information they're sharing, the CJI said that the burden should not be on petitioners or the court to point out specific details that were not shared. The court also asked SBI to submit an affidavit saying that all the information in their custody. Watch the key moments from the hearing

Electoral Bonds Row: 'What Were You Doing For 26 Days?'; SC Dismisses SBI's Extension Plea | Watch.

SBI’s extension request to the Supreme Court has raked up a political storm. With just one day to go before the Supreme Court’s deadline for SBI to disclose details of donors of electoral bonds, on Monday SBI asked the Supreme Court for an extension of nearly 3 months. This has stirred a political storm.

Baba Ramdev & his Ayurvedic medicine business are in trouble. Supreme court of India on Tuesday, issued a contempt of court notice against him and the MD of Patanjali Ayurveda Acharya Balkrishna. The two-judge bench led by Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah also criticised the central government for ‘sitting with eyes closed’ The court is angry with Patanjali for continuing to run its advertisements in which it has been making misleading claims as per the court.

A fresh plea has been filed in the Supreme Court that questions the integrity of the existing expert committee members. Appointed by the SC to look into accusations of stock manipulation, the committee is chaired by Justice (Retd.) Abhay Manohar Sapre, O P Bhatt, Justice J P Devadhar, KV Kamath, Nandan Nilekani, and Somashekhar Sundaresan.

SEBIon Monday asked the Supreme Court to grant it 15 more days to conclude the investigation into allegations against the Adani group made by US short-seller Hindenburg Research.

In a major setback, the Supreme Court refused to intervene in the NCLAT interim order declining to a stay the imposition of ₹1,337 cr penalty on Google